November 17, 2006

Taking a Closer Look, or "2+2=5"

Was it Christian of the church to call for blood in the aftermath of 9-11? no. Was it Christian, or even responsible for our "Born-again" president to jump right into a war after 9-11? Again, no. Why, then did they choose their reactions? How could so many have been fooled into thinking that the church was truly following the cause of Christ when it supported "Operation Infinite Justice" and when it continues to support the war on terror? And More importantly, judging by his actions on that day, and his manipulation of the events ever since: was the president acting like a man with nothing to hide?

It is through our reactions in life that the most revealing traits of our character show through. Sometimes to our advantage, but mostly to our shame. And of course, when and if we are faced with our shortcomings we then face the choice to either take a lesson from the experience, and grow from it, or we can ignore that a fault exists, and continue to focus on maintaining surface appearances.

Considering the far-reaching effects of September 11th, and considering that history already shows us that the Bush administration has used the event in much the same way that Adolf Hitler used the Reichstagg fire; to consolidate power under one branch of government, and to fuel a series of preemptive wars...it is of utmost importance that we critically analyze all aspects of that horrific day, if we are to know what really happened.

While all Americans have the burning towers in New York, and smoldering wreckage at the pentagon forever engraved in their minds, we also have other recorded perspectives from that day at our disposal. We all remember seeing the smoking holes in the tops of the towers, and seeing the second plane slam into it's target sending out a huge fireball. But how many of us know of numerous secondary explosions in the basement and lower floors of the towers during that period of chaos? Certainly many eyewitnesses knew, and they were quick to report them, but those eyewitness accounts have been subtly swept under the rug, and our attention has been deliberately rested high up on those buildings, away from further questions.

It is in studying the other perspectives of that day, and the aftermath that we can piece together a more defined outlook of events. There is no denying the trauma and terrible loss that our nation suffered that day. There is nothing enjoyable in rewitnessing the horror from an analytical perspective. I beleived that Bush was the Antichrist for a full eight months before I allowed myself to even consider the possibility that he had a guilty hand in the 9-11 terrorist attacks. Why? because 9-11 was just so big. As it turns out, it was the Big Lie.

But first things first, let's look at what the major players were doing in the midst of our national emergency. It was in Michael Moore's 2004, "dont vote Bush" film Farenheight 9-11, that I first saw the videotaped reaction of George W Bush when he first heard the news that our nation was under attack. He was sitting in a Florida classroom; cool, silent, and waiting. It was chilling, to say the least. At our moment of greatest need for action and leadership, George W Bush was sitting in a classroom, thinking his thoughts. We were all shocked that day, to be sure. But for George Bush to just sit quietly like that is really bizarre...and certainly not the image I think of when I imagine a president who would keep our country safe (as the republican party so lovingly portrayed him). For all the courageous rhetoric that Bush has used since that day, it is baffling that he has never been held accountable for, or even seriously questioned about his actual response on 9-11.

Back in Washington DC, and back in time we find ourselves in a pentagon meeting, 8AM; where Donald Rumsfeld becomes more than Secretary of Defense...he becomes a prophet with these words, "...sometime in the next two, four, six, eight, ten, twelve months there will be an event that will occur in the world that will be sufficiently shocking that it will remind people again how important it is to have a strong healthy Defense Department that contributes to—that underpins peace and stability in our world.”

His prophetic sentiments eerily mirror the wishlist of Neocon think tank, "The Project For a New American Century" (which he is a member of) that introduced the term a new pearl harbor back in September of 2000. The first World Trade tower is struck less than an hour after that. But even more disturbing is the fact that Rumsfeld made another prediction, “Believe me, this isn’t over yet. There’s going to be another attack, and it could be us.” moments before the pentagon is struck!

There is also the matter of a 10-30 minute period that morning when Rumsfeld went missing in action, but of course that morning was packed with chaos, so maybe I shouldn't take the missing time to mean anything in and of itself... All of these examples could be excused if they were isolated instances. But there are numerous other examples of peculiar behavior on and around the day that changed America, and the world. (for instance, why did John Ashcroft stop flying in commercial airliners around July of 2001? Why did Condoleza Rice warn Willie Brown not to fly on 9/11? and why did the FBI confiscate video security footage from a hotel and gas station around the pentagon within fifteen minutes of the strike?)

The most condemning response to the attacks came from Dick Cheney, who himself issued the command for NORAD intercept jets to “stand down” before the pentagon was hit. The order to finally cover the skies was given around 10:00 am.

I could go on and on with these examples, but the fact is this; even though our official motto is “we will never forget”, a majority of Americans would prefer that day to rest in peace out of respect for the dead. And our media has been kind enough to accomidate that sentiment, banning images and video clips from further airplay.

On the other hand, our government has seemed more than content in using September the eleventh as a hot-button issue, a scare-tactic, or the reason why the NSA would wire-tap citizen’s phones without warrents, or the US Military would be ordered to invade any sovereign nation pre-emptively. There is no doubt that our government would prefer that we never forget. But at the same time they would also rather we not get bogged down with too many gruesome details…one might suppose also out of respect for the dead.

The Bush administration waited 411 days to form an official “investigation” of the attacks. Our armed forces had been in Afghanistan more than a year by that time...When the commission was formed, it was underfunded and bogged down with red tape, leaving many questions unaddressed or unanswered . (the 9/11 commission, for instance, offered absolutely no explanation for why Building number 7 collapsed). It is also interesting to note that although George Bush and Dick Cheney did finally agree to meet with the commission they refused to officially testify, they met only under the condition that they would both remain in the same room and be interviewed at the same time, and they did not allow a recorded transcript of their meeting to be made.

So far in this analysis, we are faced with a media blackout, and what appears at a glance to be a government coverup. September eleventh is not the yet-unsolved murder of 2998 innocents any more, it has evolved into something much greater than that. It is the fuse which started a never-ending war much like the one described in George Orwell’s 1984. The war abroad to maintain the government’s iron grip of control at home. And if you are familiar with 1984, you might be familiar with “2+2=5” The reason behind that statement is a demonstration of the government’s authority in the minds of it’s citizens. If Big Brother says 2+2=5, the masses will believe that 2+2=5. Truth is defined by those in power, and accepted by it’s fearful subjects. On 9/11 we have a demonstation of that exact equation by the number of planes hyjacked adding up to the number of destructive events. Four planes went up, it should mean that four planes came down, and four events took place. But in fact four planes did go up, but five events took place. The two towers were hit (2) the pentagon was struck (+1) a plane went down in Shanksville Pennsylvania (+1) and at 5:25pm, World Trade Center building number 7 imploded on itself in about 6 seconds (+1). In this recorded series of events the public is faced with the mostly unquestioned equation of 2+2=5.

I would like to point out that there are thousands upon thousands of people all around the world who have drawn that untrue equation into question, people who have “awakened” from an apathetic slumber (or the American dream) and have taken the matter of investigation into their own hands…but even still, regardless of what is at stake, most Americans are simply not willing to accept the idea that our government had a hand in the 911 attacks. Why? Again, because it was such a massive and horrifying act of unquestionable evil. Hollywood and other sources of propaganda have portrayed America as the heros in a neverending struggle against evil men like Adolf Hitler and Saddam Hussein. We beat the nazis, we won the cold war, we fight the bad guys, and we are a Christian Nation (God Bless America!). Examining the mountain of evidence that condemns the rotten history of our CIA, or the unconstitutional, ruthless philosophies and methods of our current Neocon government (especially in regards to 9-11) is the path of greatest resistance. Because that path resists all that we have been raised to believe about ourselves.

In the big lie there is always a certain force of credibility; because the broad masses of a nation are always more easily corrupted in the deeper strata of their emotional nature than consciously or voluntarily; and thus in the primitive simplicity of their minds they more readily fall victims to the big lie than the small lie, since they themselves often tell small lies in little matters but would be ashamed to resort to large-scale falsehoods. It would never come into their heads to fabricate colossal untruths, and they would not believe that others could have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously. Even though the facts which prove this to be so may be brought clearly to their minds, they will still doubt and waver and will continue to think that there may be some other explanation. For the grossly impudent lie always leaves traces behind it, even after it has been nailed down, a fact which is known to all expert liars in this world and to all who conspire together in the art of lying. These people know only too well how to use falsehood for the basest purposes.
~Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf

The Big Lie in this case is not merely that 19 Hijackers with boxcutters were solely responsible for the events of 9-11, but more-so that George W Bush is the rough-and-tumble cowboy savior of the western world. The Big Lie is that Bush is a leader brave enough to face an enemy that would stop at nothing to destroy us, regardless of the cost. Because the fact remains that George W Bush and Tony Blair have done more to destroy the foundations of western freedom than any outside enemy ever could.

The wars in Afghanistan and Iraq are not about liberation, they are about domination. The enemy of the people is not foreign, it is undoubtably domestic. And George W Bush is not a Christian soldier, he is not a savior of life. He is a remorseless, cold-blooded killer. A false savior. an Antichrist.


October 17, 2006

The Father of Lies


"The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world he doesn't exist."
-the Usual Suspects


"The Devil" is one of the most controversial and fascinating subjects of Biblical lore. Some people believe not only that he does exist but that he also has red skin, horns and a pointed tail. While another group would say that he appears as an angel of light to trick us into veering from that narrow road of righteousness. There are still others who believe that the devil is a figment of the irresponsible human imagination; they consider it foolishness to say, "The Devil made me do it", no matter what the circumstance is. These skeptics laugh at demon worship, and enjoy movies such as The Omen, The Evil Dead, or The Exorcist.

There is no doubt that we have sin within our own flesh, I agree that it's a cop-out to blame the devil for personal failure But it is dangerous to ignore his existance altogether. The devil is in fact the head of an unholy trinity of sin, which consists of the devil, the world and the flesh.

Be sober, be vigilant; because your adversary the devil, as a roaring lion, walketh about, seeking whom he may devour.
He is known as the accuser of the bretheren. He is also the "father of lies". The Devil is the enemy of God: a being driven mad by his upcoming judgement. He is the ultimate living expression of deception, damnation, temptation, illusion and rebellion. But he wasn't always an enemy. And in order to understand who he is now, it is needful for us to examine his previous state of being.

when God created the angel Lucifer, He was beautiful and brilliant: "the morning star", adorned in precious stones! He had great freedom to come and go as he pleased. He was apparently given great authority, he was brought into creation at the very peak of his perfection. There was no room for improvement or maturity in this creature.
This is how Ezekial describes him:

Thou sealest up the sum, full of wisdom, and perfect in beauty. Thou hast been in Eden the garden of God every precious stone was thy covering...Thou art the anointed cherub that covereth; and I have set thee so: thou wast upon the holy mountain of God; thou hast walked up and down in the midst of the stones of fire. Thou wast perfect in thy ways from the day that thou wast created, till iniquity was found in thee. By the multitude of thy merchandise they have filled the midst of thee with violence, and thou hast sinned: therefore I will cast thee as profane out of the mountain of God: and I will destroy thee, O covering cherub


In all of creation there was only One more beautiful, more brilliant, more perfect that this creature, and that One is the King of All. Imagine that! What would it be like in that position?

imagine being born fully matured, truly perfect, "sealing up the sum" of creation, adorned with jewels, having the universe laid out at your feet, as you stand on the mountain of God himself. Imagine light radiating from your very body, as you wander through creation, dancing among planets, comets and suns. Imagine that your job is to conceal the glory of God. To cover up God's Holiness. Your job is to be a filter over the only perfection that is greater than yours. A perfection so pure that it cannot be directly seen. Imagine serving this creator in a universe without sin, a universe that has been weighed in the balance, and leveled out perfectly. All is well in all creation...



Now imagine your gaze drifting to the throne of your creator. Imagine your mind as it wanders from the known and set routine of your heavenly duties to a whole new line of exotic thinking. Imagine yourself begin to dream of doing the one thing that is forbidden of you to do. Quietly dreaming of being not even equal to, but actually better than your master: dreaming about taking the very throne of God. There is no one you can talk these thoughts through with, because you have no peers, only the lesser angels beneath you, and the object of your forbidden fantasies above. Alone in your tortured state.

These were harmless thoughts and at first, perhaps, but as Lucifer's mind continued to dwell, the power and pull of the dream grew stronger. Think about the silent struggle that took place in the mind of Lucifer: between his innate sense of obedience, and this brand new hunger. You can almost see him make his decision, see his eyes fill up with the first ever glint of that all consuming fire which we call greed...

What happened after that decision was made? What happened when Lucifer tried to take the judgement seat, the throne of the Father? Jesus told his followers plainly, "I saw Satan fall like lightning from heaven". The prophet Isaiah also witnessed the judgement of Lucifer, and spoke forth this message for our edification:
How you have fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the dawn! You have been cast down to the earth, you who once laid low the nations! You said in your heart, "I will ascend to heaven; I will raise my throne above the stars of God; I will sit enthroned on the mount of assembly,
on the utmost heights of the sacred mountain. I will ascend above the tops of the clouds; I will make myself like the Most High." But you are brought down to the grave, to the depths of the pit

There is talk of death, yet Lucifer still lives. What's going on here? Just which "death" is the prophet Isaiah referring to? Is he describing the devil being bound up and caste in to the lake of fire, as he soon shall be? Did Isaiah see a picture of the "second death" which is reserved for the devil, the beast and the false prophet, as well as all the unrepentent? I'm not sure. Perhaps he saw a type of that final judgement, but I think Isaiah was shown the death of the sin which is separation from God. Just as Adam didn't literally die the day he ate of the forbidden fruit, but was cursed and no longer allowed to walk with God after his sin, so was Lucifer cursed when sin entered into him. All of sin is basically a blindness to the wonderful enriching nature of God's will. The narrow road that leads to life is one which is taken by the will of God. But lost to the truth, and in our sinful state, we think we know how to best spend our lives. By staying self-centered and stubborn in our ways, we are enslaved to sin, and we can never reach the fullness of our potential. It is when the dead look back upon their lives and see what they missed by refusing to do the will of God, it is then that they begin to weep and gnash their teeth. There are no exceptions to this truth. By doing whatever we want to do, making decisions based on our very limited perspective of the greater reality; by not trusting in or waiting on the Lord...we sin. And as we know, the wages of sin is death!

However, angels are beings of pure spirit, and are not imprisoned in flesh, so death does not affect them because they were not created out of clay as Adam was. There is no angelic grave, but there is imprisonment. It is the earth itself which holds the devil and his angels until the day of the Lord. In Genesis, God numbers the days of man to no more than 120 years. However Lucifer, the fallen one, lives on earth right now awaiting his judgement. Think about that, Satan has been on earth for thousands of years, since being cursed at Eden. The lake of fire which awaits the wicked on judgement day was reserved for Satan and his angels, according to the Christ. So what gives? Why are angels granted lifespans which glide through millenia with no problem? For instance, the angel Gabriel helped interpret Daniel's vision in Babylon, yet hundreds of years later who should deliver the news of John the Baptist's birth but the angel Gabriel? Just how long do these angels live, anyway? Do they just pop in and out of existance as needed? as spirit beings are they created once to live forever?


There are many paintings that depict angels as being infants with wings: so cute and adorable and holy and precious, yet that image could not conflict more with the scriptures. Not once in scripture is an angel described as being a child. They are described as either appearing like men, or like creatures with human and animal parts, covered by many sets of wings and many many eyes!! Children are simply underdeveloped adults. They represent the spring bud of human life, and their innocence and potential is strictly a human feature.

The point is this: neither Lucifer nor the other fallen angels have that redemptive trait which humanity has been given. They cannot learn from their mistakes. They cannot repent. Which is one reason why they hate humanity so very much. They do not die, as human's do, but they also cannot be redeemed as we can, under the blood of Christ. Why is that? Because they knew better. Lucifer at least personally met, saw and interacted with God. He was brought into existance at the peak of his perfection. Therefore, he had no room to grow or mature. We human beings don't know how to appreciate the miraculous nature of our personal path of growth, redemption and maturity. We don't know what a precious gift we have been given in the random state of being called mortal life. Angels simply cannot "grow up". They do not evolve on a personal level, they exist solely to serve their designed purpose under heaven. But Lucifer and his angels have fallen from grace, they have abandoned their posts, and even now await the final verdict of their judgement. I suggest you Read Revelation 12 to get a better idea of what sort of enemy we are up against. All humanity is hated by Lucifer and his angels for several reasons:
  1. we have room for improvement
  2. we have been blessed with the chance for redemption
  3. God created us in his own image
So in closing, be careful, be watchful and be vigilant. Because the devil does exist, and if you let him he will devour you. But he has been defeated by the blood of Christ. And even now is being ushered into the arena to receive his judgement.

Revelation 12:12

Woe to the inhabitants of the earth and the sea! For the devil has come down to you, having great wrath, because he knows that he has a short time.

September 22, 2006

Hugo Chavez vs. El Diablo!

On the morning of September 20th, Hugo Chavez, president of Venezuela, stood before the Assembled United Nations in New York and delivered a powerful and moving speech. His message was bold in truth, impacting…powerful and was very well received (as shown through a thunderous round of applause by UN members upon it’s conclusion).

In this speech Chavez refers to Bush as “El Diablo”, several times and denounces the imperial agenda of the American war-machine. He draws to question Bush’s idea of “extremists”, for our president seems to see them everywhere. He commented on the way that Bush addressed the nation the day before as though he owned the world…Chavez acted with a courage that may not be allowed in the near future. He spoke with a freedom that is being actively reduced. He warned the UN, and indeed the world of the horrors which are to come, if we do not take a stand against the responsible parties.

Chavez’s address has quickly been twisted by the televised media as though it were a shameless and embarrassing move on the part of the Venezuelan president. They decry the tasteless nature of Chavez’s accusations, spouting on about how it’s inappropriate for anyone in his position to say these things about George Bush while in America. They equate this speech to a rude guest insulting his host at a house party. It is a nice picture, I must say, very dismissive and cutting, but the media is ignoring greater truths (just as it ignores the mountain of evidence concerning what really happened on 9-11-01)

Chavez was addressing the United Nations, whose headquarters just so happens to be located in New York city. He was not making cheap shots on a personal level, but exercising his right to speak freely and candidly, warning the assembled of what he sees a very serious threat. He may become a target of the American military as an indirect result of his words. He knows what the US Armed forces are willing to do, because the US military was involved in an attempted coup against Chavez in April of 2002. Of course that's been mostly covered up...leaving just enough evidence to condemn them in the minds of patriotic citizens who investigate independently and act as watchdogs on our crooked government.

Let us see beyond the spin of our media, and remember that America is also not our president’s house, or personal property! This nation is not some sort of safety zone which protects our president from any scrutiny. A president stands or falls by the foundation of his actions. We do not pretend that Bush is infallible here in America, why? Because we do not live in a dictatorship…yet. The American democracy is hinged on accountability, and Mr. Bush has almost six years of lies, murder, and the service of greed and corporate interests to answer for. Bush hides behind his mask of rhetoric, and has used fear to promote a truly sinister agenda. We have a very clear and ugly scope of perspective now, more than five years after 9-11, We see what has been done with what we have given our government.

The USA Patriot act was passed in the fall of ‘01, compromising the privacy of the American public…what does the Bush camp do next? It wire-taps millions of American phones without a warrant. Our military forces invade the sovereign nation of Afghanistan as a part of the global war on terror…a war that is supposedly not against nations, but extremists and terrorist groups all throughout the world….We invade with the promise of vengeance, and the capture of Osama Bin Laden. We engage in one preemptive war, because of all that we had been promised. Promises which are yet to be fulfilled and a year and a half later what does the Bush camp do? It sends our military into yet another nation, swaying public opinion through a campaign of fear, and lies. They also manipulated the hearts of Americans by stoutly decrying Saddam Hussein for torturing Iraqis...but that's another subject entirely.

Whenever we give an inch, they steal a mile. That is why we must stand up in resistance to the rhetoric and doublespeak we are bombarded with. We must make it known that we are not the fools they make us out to be. This is a very serious state of affairs.

So for the media to equate our nation with the personal residence of president Bush is for the media to act as if we were under a monarchy or in a dictatorship.

Bush may ignore the polls, ignore the direction that the people of this nation would like to head. He may use and abuse his executive privileges as much as he thinks he can get away with, he may rudely interrupt anyone he wants to at any time with a harsh and childish "Can I finish?". He may sit tight on the worlds largest nuclear stockpile, he may be surrounded by layers of planning and protection, thinking himself untouchable and already a king... but he simply cannot create unquestioning and unwavering support for his policies. And though the media would like to think that he can…while they would like to think that our nation is the personal property or “house” of George W Bush…it simply isn’t the case. And while they would also like to think that Chavez is nothing more than a certifiably insane conspiracy theorist or religious nut…the truth is that he is the democratically elected leader of the sovereign nation of Venezuela.

Reality stands in protest to spin, and the rock of truth will crush any structure of lies that now stands in the world. For the angel of the Lord did proclaim upon the sounding of the seventh trumpet in Revelation 11; “The kingdom of this world has become the kingdom of our Lord, and of his Messiah, and he will reign forever and ever”.

That time will come…the battle of the end is upon us, and it’s fury will intensify as the heat of a raging fire; yet the victory of this struggle is assured to Christ, and all who call upon him in their time of trouble. Hallelujah! Stand in love and you shall see the truth, and that truth will set you free from fear, deception, and all the trappings of sin.

“Let love be genuine, hate what is evil, hold fast to what is good”

search your heart to find the motive that Chavez had to say what he did. I have searched mine, and found his motives to be based on love.


June 14, 2006

Unholy Spirit

Out in the wilderness, 2000+ years ago, under a sun which shines like inferno, we see two figures. First, there is Jesus of Nazareth; lips blistered, eyes sunk, looking as though he should drop from malnutrition after 40 days of fasting. Yet he stands tall, and does not waver as he speaks with the other. Who is the other? the Devil, of course, transforming master of temptation. He can be a dragon, a serpent, a shadow or a radiant angel. We see the angel now, looking amazingly healthy compared to the Christ. Jesus has spent the past forty days out here in the desert, in preparation for his upcoming ministry, and now he is being tested to the limit of his endurance. For while he is the Son of God, he is also a creature housed in flesh, and the flesh does have it's limits. That is the point of another post, but basically, in this desert scene we find Christ doing battle with, and triumphing over, all three aspects of the unholy trinity: the devil, the world, and the flesh. But rather than retell the whole story of Christ's temptations, I would like to bring up one particular moment:


And the devil, taking him up into an high mountain, shewed unto him all the kingdoms of the world in a moment of time. And the devil said unto him, All this power will I give thee, and the glory of them: for that is delivered unto me; and to whomsoever I will I give it. If thou therefore wilt worship me, all shall be thine.
While the extent of Satan's authority in this world sinks in, I'd like to draw your attention to John 16, where Christ makes two promises:
  1. In the world ye shall have tribulation:
  2. but be of good cheer; I have overcome the world
He also told the Roman Governor who sentenced him to crucifixion plainly that his kingdom is not of this world. Knowing that, campaigns such as the 700 club "Operation Prayer Shield" are to be brought into question. The idea of uniting church and state under the rule of this current state is foolish, yet that is exactly what's happening. Faith-based charities are getting federal funding, Our president's language is filled with religious words when he discusses "souls" and "evildoers". President Bush is, for all intents and purposes, the figurehead of the religious right, because he has confessed to being "born again" and he constantly peppers his speeches with his "Christianese". Yet president Bush is also a self-confessed spokesman for the upper class, the wealthiest 1% of America...so which master is he serving, exactly? God, or Money?

The answer is obvious: it's in the bank. Bush's allegiance is to the world, and thusly to the devil, no matter what he says.

So what exactly is this enemy we face, this false promise, this world system? According to Wikipedia, the word "World" evolved from two Olde English terms, "were" meaning man (as in werewolf), and "eld" meaning age. So it literally means the age of man. The empires in history are the boldest manifestation of the "spirit of the world". Mankind has lived throughout the ages in a tug-of-war between God and the devil. 1 Corinthians 2:12 says "We have not received the spirit of the world but the Spirit who is from God, that we may understand what God has freely given us."

It astounds me that even though justice, mercy, love and truth are all forces that serve God, the world has been under the sway and influence of the devil. He is allowed only to impersonate God's goodness, never to duplicate it, so if any of us spent time really thinking about all that calls itself good, the liars would soon become very obvious to us. Unfortunately, people don't seem to want to think, or question, or stop and reassess. Instead, while we think that we are taking the path of least resistance, people throughout history support tyrant after tyrant which cause us to envy, hate, and make war on one another.

The unchanging truth is simple. Our only hope for peace is in learning to love one another. But most people seem to prefer patriotism over peace; selfish lies to the difficult truth, and the approval of our neighbors to the approval of God. Which is a great sign of the devil's astounding authority in the world. In Revelation 13, there is a prophecy of a final world empire, and it's ruler. When the empire first arises from the sea, Rev 13:2 says this:
The dragon gave the beast his power and his throne and great authority.
This empire is then described in full, and when the third beast, from the earth appears, it is said that he "exercised all the authority of the first beast on his behalf". This ties in the dragon, beast of the earth and the beast of the sea represent an "unholy trinity", which is represented by the dragon as the opposite of God the father, the Beast of the sea representing the unholy spirit, and the beast of the earth representing the Antichrist. This is a concept not taught by most end-times teachers, but it has support in the scriptures. I write more in depth on that subject in this post.

It is important to remember that the "spirit of the world" is not limited to politics and empires. It has many faces, many manifestations. The Unholy spirit is, in essence, The System. It includes, but is not limited to: religion, commerce, politics, and entertainment (although God has double agents in all of these areas). In Bible-speak world represents the various networks of humanity which set themselves up as independent from God. As technology increases, so, naturally does a sense of assurance arise in mankind. We work together to defeat the elements and gain a hope in our accomplishments.Time and time again, God has wanted man to believe that God is good, and will provide for our needs, if we would only subject ourselves to his authority, and strive to communicate with him through prayer. God loves it when we give Him the opportunity to bless us (although I'm not saying that following him is free from trouble or trial...it isn't). Jesus taught by example, that God provides everything a sparrow needs to survive, and reminded us how much more valuable we are to God, and how much more ready he is to provide for us. But with the ease and convenience of modern society, people are kept from seeking God for guidance and provision. Many American families thank God routinely at the dinner table, but for meals that came by shopping and not by miraculous provision. Just flip on the Television and you will be bombarded with all the latest ways that corporations are working to make your life easier, more ego-centric, and generally more self indulgent.

Humanity, in this cocoon of fast-food drive-thrus, medicine and creature comforts, has become numb not only to God's provision, but also to the curse that was given to Adam for his sin. Here in our cubicles our brows don't sweat, we do not have reason to seek salvation if we don't sense a need for it. So be aware: to be comfortable and satisfied with the status quo is to be blind to the deeper hope, possibility, and greater promise of the kingdom of God. We are warned in the letters of the New Testament that "friendship with the world is enmity with God", and to "Be in the world, but not of it". So it's accurate to call the world "unholy spirit" For to be holy is to be set apart from, and therefore to be unholy is to be a part of. So which master do you serve? This message is not meant to be a condemnation, but rather a warning to avoid complacency at any cost. Now that you have heard the truth, you (if you have ears to hear it) know the truth, and as you know the truth, it shall set you free. Being free, you are then commissioned to spreading the message of truth. Jesus, in prayer, said this of his followers, John 17:14-20

I have given them your word and the world has hated them, for they are not of the world any more than I am of the world. My prayer is not that you take them out of the world but that you protect them from the evil one. They are not of the world, even as I am not of it. Sanctify them by the truth; your word is truth. As you sent me into the world, I have sent them into the world. For them I sanctify myself, that they too may be truly sanctified. My prayer is not for them alone. I pray also for those who will believe in me through their message...


On September 11th 1990, George H.W. Bush prophesied the coming of a New World Order, which is even now being ushered into place. If you have a dollar bill, look on it's back and you will find symbology pointing to the NWO. On the left portion of your bill is the Illuminati pyramid of power, topped off by a floating capstone which contains the all-seeing eye of enlightenment. This is the diagram of current global control, represented by groups such as the Bilderbergers, the Trilateral Commission, the Council on Foreign Relations. The pattern and spirit can also be found in secret societies such as Skull and Bones, and the highest degrees of Freemasonry. The symbol of the pyramid is a blueprint of the corrupt power-structure pattern which has been used over and over again in operations which further the New World Order agenda. It is the consolidation of power. Always there is a base of ignorance and slavery, people who are pacified by simple indulgence and selfish inaction, who are then topped by people of greater authority and understanding in a pattern which rises all the way up to a capstone of rulership.




As Jesus saw and heard in the wilderness during his temptations, the Devil is and has been in control of all the kingdoms of this world, from Babel to America. He is the golden capstone which has topped the pyramid of worldly power from the beginning of history, ruling from behind the scenes. he tempts and guides the corrupted leaders of men, and he enslaves the common people in their sins. He influences the hearts of the wicked and the weak (which we all are), and he has vowed to destroy the righteous.

But do not be discouraged by this darkness, but be comforted by the spirit of truth which the Father in heaven give to all who seek it.

May 26, 2006














The shadows acting out a drama
always playing for it's captive audience.
Chained in place, their faces straight ahead
They never see or think to seek the truth.

A solitary soul has broken free
the chains are thrown aside as he ascends
and seeks the truth and what is there beyond

To reach the mouth of this, the prison cave.
And hide his eyes from such a brillant sun
the life and world outside his own experience
his eyes adjust his soul is open wide

stumbling around the outer world
feeling drunk with overstimulation
How could this have been here all along?
How could there be so much beyond the prison

running back to warn his captive brothers
back into the darkness of the cave
loosing sight of day for just a moment
long enough to get the word across...

And in the cave, return to prison.
who would find acceptance there?
Our hero comes to find the crowd afraid
wrapped up in their chains and terrified of change
He runs into the scene excited
telling of another better way of living
they see him as a raving madman
they mark as lies what they will not confirm:
that something better rests beyond what they have known
They do not want to know it at all
they want to close themselves off
how can they accept something so big, and scary, unbecoming?
gone against the grain, our hero fought a battle of perception
this is how he won his exile.


March 28, 2006

The Plight of the Poorest


Let's take a look away from the big generalized problems of the Reich-ening of our nation for a moment...and on the corner of a city street. Fix a glance at the face of hunger, the humanity of poverty right here in America.

TheHomelessGuy Blog

Kevin Barbieux has been blogging for two + years and gives a much needed personal glimpse at the living problem no one wants to know.
he shared this wonderfully simple approach to bridging the gap of class separation...

So, you ask yourself, "Self, what can I do? How can I help homeless people, even though I don't have much?"

Well, there IS something you can do. There are many things that homeless people usually do without, which sometimes seem insignificant, that homeless would be very happy to receive.

This is a project you can do rather inexpensively - and you can make this a project to do with friends, or your Church group, and share the expense - and you can include people of all age groups.

Get some paper lunch bags and fill them with little goodies. This is just a list of things I can think of, that everyone on the streets would need and appreciate. You might have your own good ideas too. -- "travel size" tooth paste and tooth brush and deodorant. A pair of new or clean socks (it's hard to keep feet healthy on the street) nail clippers, a comb, a bar of soap, gloves when it's cold out, a disposable razor, etc. Then add something special, like little Halloween size candies, a personal note that says "I care". You could even decorate the bags with drawings of happy faces and hearts - yeah, even mean ol' grumpy homeless guys like that kind of stuff - even if they don't admit it.

Once you have your care packages together, take them to where homeless people hang out - wherever it's safe for you too. If you aren't a proper adult, bring along proper adult supervision. And personally hand out the packages. Just try to plan to have enough for each homeless person.

Now it does happen sometimes, when you do this, that a street person will then ask you for something you don't have, or you are uncomfortable with giving. Just tell them that the packages are all you have right now, and that you're sorry you can't help more. Sometimes they will try to make you feel guilty so they can get more out of you. Be polite but firm. If you set, and hold to your limits, they will respect you for it. This is a great way of giving. I have received such packages myself - they've always been a blessing.
~Kevin Barbieux

Remember, Christ said, "Blessed are the poor in spirit, for theirs is the kingdom of God."

The stuffed-shirt, dirt-free, nose in the sky attitude of the modern church system is not without judgment. If the modern protestant institution put forth just a fraction of the effort sheltering the homeless as they have put into building newer, better, and more churches, we would have nowhere near as many homeless people in this nation to ignore.

Just as $40 billion would feed that 25% of the world impoverished and abandoned for a full year. The fruit of our priorities shows through for all to see. "Where your heart is, there your treasure will be". and of course, "The Love of Money is the root of all evil"

Christ shared this parable, to one of his many crowds:


"There was a rich man who was dressed in purple and fine linen and lived in luxury every day. At his gate was laid a beggar named Lazarus, covered with sores and longing to eat what fell from the rich man's table. Even the dogs came and licked his sores.

"The time came when the beggar died and the angels carried him to Abraham's side. The rich man also died and was buried. In hell, where he was in torment, he looked up and saw Abraham far away, with Lazarus by his side. So he called to him, 'Father Abraham, have pity on me and send Lazarus to dip the tip of his finger in water and cool my tongue, because I am in agony in this fire.'

"But Abraham replied, 'Son, remember that in your lifetime you received your good things, while Lazarus received bad things, but now he is comforted here and you are in agony. And besides all this, between us and you a great chasm has been fixed, so that those who want to go from here to you cannot, nor can anyone cross over from there to us.'
"He answered, 'Then I beg you, father, send Lazarus to my father's house, 28for I have five brothers. Let him warn them, so that they will not also come to this place of torment.'
"Abraham replied, 'They have Moses and the Prophets; let them listen to them.'
" 'No, father Abraham,' he said, 'but if someone from the dead goes to them, they will repent.'
"He said to him, 'If they do not listen to Moses and the Prophets, they will not be convinced even if someone rises from the dead.' "


March 24, 2006

ASK and it shall be given you!!


Publicity from Hollywood:

Charlie Sheen on CNN!!!

Big big news, spread the word, anyone that reads this whoever you are. This is a wildfire, fan it, people, FAN IT!!


Fight for the truth. It's never over 'til it's over. And as long as the sun rises, and the constitution is in effect, this war for our own freedom (the silent war, the infowar) is not lost!!Speak out!! It is your American duty!! As Teddy Roosevelt himself said in the Kansas City Star:

"The President is merely the most important among a large number of public servants. He should be supported or opposed exactly to the degree which is warranted by his good conduct or bad conduct, his efficiency or inefficiency in rendering loyal, able, and disinterested service to the Nation as a whole. Therefore it is absolutely necessary that there should be full liberty to tell the truth about his acts, and this means that it is exactly necessary to blame him when he does wrong as to praise him when he does right. Any other attitude in an American citizen is both base and servile. To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public. Nothing but the truth should be spoken about him or any one else. But it is even more important to tell the truth, pleasant or unpleasant, about him than about any one else."



March 22, 2006

Concentration Camps?

Bush's "New Program"

Prison Planet's "American Gulag" article


Declassified documents concerning Prison camps

Would like to share these links just in case there is validity to them. We are not to worry about the great and terrible day of the Lord. And we are not to wish for it, but we are to be alert, sober, aware and informed about what is going on. (Thanks for the links, Nari)

When Christ said "Do not worry" about the end times, he did NOT mean "Do not care" We are called to always be ready, always alert, always on guard and ready for the call of duty that would bring us into the spiritual battlefield. This is a war on two fronts, of the physical, and the spiritual.

And in other news, Charlie Sheen is speaking out about the 9-11 questions.

(credit for sharing this belongs to Mike "The Eye" Micayah)

February 25, 2006

February 21, 2006

Who Will Repay?

Although I am grateful to be "awakened" I must admit: It's incredibly draining sometimes to be aware of what's really going on in the world. It's just surreal. To question official cover-stories (like 911), To be locked outside the "mainstream" watching the flow of events as a river leading to a waterfall, it's like living a dream. I would not have chosen to be on the outside screaming in a warning. Would not have chosen to know a truth that most would dismiss as a lie. It is frustrating to deal with people who assume that this perspective is entertaining, or comfortable. It isn't enjoyable, it isn't fun, but it is true.







Recently inspired, respectively by the efforts of Kevin G, Peace, and Nari; to spread the word of the infowar, and to cover some of the many bases, I give you a brief link list:
The Smoking Gun

Bush-Hitler Connection


Reichstag Fire

The White Rose

Pre-9/11 Afghanistan Attack Plans


Project for the New American Century




I was unprepared, overly ambitious and almost entirely burned myself out when I first found out about these things. I wanted to spread the word of how we the people are empowered to rise up in protest, how we aren't helpless, how we always have outnumbered these controllers (no matter how much money and power they hoard) That we don't have to be sheep. We don't have to be as lambs led to the slaughter, we don't have to simply accept the cards as they are dealt to us. And how by resigning to that fate we are in fact choosing to be complicit.

"Let love be genuine. Abhor what is evil; hold fast to what is good."

As new creations however, we are instructed exactly how to overcome that evil.

"But I tell you who hear me: Love your enemies, do good to those who hate you, bless those who curse you, pray for those who mistreat you."

"Forgive our sins as we forgive those who have sinned against us, and lead us not into temptation, but deliver us from evil"
Romans 12
Bless those who persecute you; bless and do not curse them. Repay no one evil for evil, but give thought to do what is honorable in the sight of all. If possible, so far as it depends on you, live peaceably with all.

So even though this is the administration that a lot of us love to hate....it is STILL our command to leave judgment of them to God. Because in hating them, we ourselves become imprisoned in emotional bondage. As tempting as it may be to stay blindly enraged. They are not affected by it. Change comes by counter-action. By taking a stand to the truth, and by never resorting to violence as a means to ending violence.

...Do not be overcome by evil, but overcome evil with good.
Beloved, never avenge yourselves, but leave it to the wrath of God, for it is written, "Vengeance is mine, I will repay, says the Lord."

remember:

These guys have sold their souls to Satan. They have become willing puppets of the devil in exchange for money and power.

They have cursed the name of their creator God and trampled on biblical Christianity. They have abandoned our collective responsibility of being stewards of the planet in exchange for corporate handouts. They have cashed in on eternity itself, and their reward will only last as long as their mortal lives do.

Greed is a hunger that can never be satisfied. Hanchett was right on in his "addict" post. This year so far even their good friends in the media are turning against them. Depressingly low polls, whistles being blown, rumors of actual impeachment, a grocery list of war-crimes that's been adding up for years...
They are painted in a corner. Strung out on a greed high, furiously digging the grave of our nation, of democracy, the constitution the world as we know it and for what?
To usher in their own damnation.





February 15, 2006

World on Fire

An eternally curious race
in a quest of purpose
never running out of questions
Pain is but the greatest process
to achieving new perfection
Outside of our innate senses
lost and sleeping understanding
there is no escape from our shared delirium

Progress has become a concept
Idealized, weaponized

civilized our sterile minds have no connection
to our very souls. our common sense

this is the price we pay for liberty
our own imprisonment to senseless self indulgence
I wonder if we can ever force ourselves to see
To recognize the sense of misery
that surrounds us all. the method of our madness




Tell me that this is not hell on Earth
Lining up against our brother
We fight to prove ourselves and pass the time
To rally up support
the enemy must not possess humanity
We vow that God is on our side,
and we shall win this fight
and any price of life is seen
only as a further sacrifice
to the great crusade the highest cause
of some abstract and detached perception
of what the people want


Disemboweled truths
twisted, cleaned, wrung out and
hung up to become another cut and dried response
there's no time for nonsense
no time for Here & Now to blossom
with THE END so close


Pharisees and Politicians
just as blind as lady justice
weighing out her daily bribe
with blood soaked hands and heavy hearts
Both sides claim to fight
for freedom, peace and life
destruction of an enemy
that isn't really human

Suicide in protest is a testament to sickness
but not of them who die but we who lie
imprisoned in complacence
Blood is shed to show the way
That we have failed each other
that we now bring about
our own destruction

the end will justify the means
the lesson lost in understanding
~Poem by Young Brother







Passers-by stop to watch as flames envelope a young Buddhist monk, Saigon, October 5th, 1963.

The man sits impassively in the central market square, he has set himself on fire performing a ritual suicide in protest against governmental anti-Buddhist policies. Crowds gathered to protest in Hue after the South Vietnamese government prohibited Buddhists from carrying flags on Buddha's birthday. Government troops opened fire to disperse the dissidents, killing nine people, Diems government blamed the incident on the Vietcong and never admitted responsibility. The Buddhist leadership quickly organized demonstrations that eventually led to seven monks burning themselves to death.

I guess you must eventually become immune - the man behind the monk is still trying to find a light for his cigarette.

January 31, 2006

Even the Right thinks something is Wrong

"The President is merely the most important among a large number of public servants. He should be supported or opposed exactly to the degree which is warranted by his good conduct or bad conduct, his efficiency or inefficiency in rendering loyal, able, and disinterested service to the Nation as a whole. Therefore it is absolutely necessary that there should be full liberty to tell the truth about his acts, and this means that it is exactly necessary to blame him when he does wrong as to praise him when he does right. Any other attitude in an American citizen is both base and servile. To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public. Nothing but the truth should be spoken about him or any one else. But it is even more important to tell the truth, pleasant or unpleasant, about him than about any one else."

Theodore Roosevelt in the Kansas City Star, 149
May 7, 1918


The following is an article I read a few months ago, which. Light appears even from within the castle of corruption! Some Republicans IN THE WHITE HOUSE are now resisting their tyrant king. There is a stirring in the nation as if from a mass of hypnotized peopole coming to. As time goes on it is becoming more and more apparent that this self-proclaimed "compassionate conservative" of a president has a much darker side, and a very different agenda than his pre-written, planned and patterned rhetoric suggests. A few party-line loyalists are waking up to this fact, returning to their founding conservative beliefs, and remembering their first and greatest nemisis: BIG GOVERNMENT! They realise this man Bush is truly a wolf in sheeps clothing. They are realising just how serious he was when quoted to say:


"If this were a dictatorship, it'd be a heck-of-a lot easier, just as long as I'm the dictator."
---Washington, DC, Dec 18, 2000, during his first trip to Washington as President-Elect


The Moderate Independant, a source of news in great brittain produced a wonderful article which reads, in part:

The term "conservative" is used by commentators such as Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity to describe themselves. It is used by Bush supporters to define themselves. But what really is conservatism? and why are so many true conservatives disgusted by this new breed of Bush/Limbaugh Republicans?
.......................
The old conservative ideal was that of the wise father figure who was charged with the power in society and would do the right thing for his national family. This did not mean gutting infrastructure and slashing and burning the nation to disfunctionality. It meant to act as the wise moderator, balancing the "family's" needs with the means of the nation. Yes, conservatives were the moderators, not the extremists. They were not radicals who sought to take the nation and launch it this way or that. Exactly the opposite, they sought to "conserve" the traditional institutions and social structure. Actions should be taken to fix things as needed, but minimally. Don't create drastic new programs, but don't drastically trash the existing ones either. Just because a family's (i.e. nation's) financial situation goes down a bit, you don't stop feeding the baby and let the roof leak through. Now the feminist era, the free-love era, many of these social upheavals did not sit well with these old, wise father type conservatives. They wanted to maintain the traditional "family values" (beginning to sound familiar?) and social order. Insert Rush Limbaugh and the elder Bush. They proclaimed the Republicans the party of "family values." They took on the "femi-Nazis" who threatened the traditional patriarchal structure. They took on gays, free-lovers, all non-traditional social types. And in doing so, they appealed to the many conservatives who were out there feeling voiceless, frustrated, and unrepresented (much as many liberals and moderates do today.) So, now you have all these traditional-minded, mainly white male conservatives with someone out there giving voice to the thoughts that had been labeled unspeakable. Hearing Rush and Bush, Sr. must have been like being able to exhale for the first time after decades of being forced to hold their breath. However, this being the common ground, the direction Limbaugh, Hannity, Bush, Jr., et. al have attempted to steer these true conservatives does not sit well with those who truly are conservatives - especially those old and wise enough to know what conservatism is (i.e. the patriarchs of the conservative movement.) Yes, they are spoken for socially, but then there was a bait and switch, and politically, they are being misrepresented and their movement hijacked by leaders who are, "appall"ingly, according to true conservatives like the gentleman above, "mortgaging social infrastructure trying to balance annual budgets." Until now, the idea of accepting some coldness towards the family's needs in return for regaining their voice and power was enough to get these conservatives to play along. But now, President Bush and his brand of neo-conservative has taken the coldness or their slash and burn social agenda so far that these good patriarchs are now having to distance themselves, step away from the Limabugh's, Hannity's, and Bushes and ask themselves what sort of good father would let their house and family be so trashed in the name of "balanc(ing) annual budgets," especially when it is clear the only reason annual budgets are so unbalanced is because of overly excessive tax cutting. A paternalist wouldn't care more about corporate profit than his child getting asthma or wife getting emphysema. A paternalist wouldn't agree to a war for oil. A paternalist wouldn't thrash the school system for tax cuts for the wealthy. When this new breed of Limbaugh conservative came on the scene, as we said, the conservatives were ecstatic to finally have a voice. So in droves they helped create "The Republican Revolution" that propelled Gingrich and company to power in 1994. It didn't take long though for true conservatives to see that this new breed of fake conservative was just a wolf in conservative clothing. Gingrich's name became anathema to good American conservatives and the Republicans not only stopped gaining, but lost seats in each of the next two elections. Betrayed, the true conservatives were then left with a choice between a heartless, greed-driven Republican Party and a Democratic Party that fully embraced the American brand of table-turning feminism, that had been emasculated by the "femi-Nazis." The question for good conservatives became what would happen first, would the Republicans get a heart or would the Democrats get balls. Well, the Democrats weren't about to have any candidate who stood up and said, "Let men be men and women be women," or, "American 'feminism' is very anti-feminine; why can't men be men and women be women while we all have equal rights and protections?" It wasn't about to happen, and, in fact, didn't. On the other side of things, the new-Limbaugh breed of Republicans found their solution. Having found their following the first time by lying upon lying upon lying, pretending to be good conservatives when they were truly just hateful greed-mongers playing on conservative disaffection with the social upheaval of the 60's and 70's, the Limbaugh conservatives once again found their lie line. The conservatives were upset with them because they had no heart? Ok, let's say we have a heart. And so, deciding to simply pay dishonest lip service to their base's true concerns, they started calling themselves "compassionate conservatives." And it worked well enough to get the base to trust them once again. The Bush/Limbaugh Republicans rejoiced, thinking they had found their solution. Simply tell the people you are kind, and it calms their concerns, tell the people you are compassionate, that you are doing the right thing, and it allows them to feel better. Once in office, President Bush continued in this vein. The question wasn't what would the best policy be, it was (and is,) "What do the people want to hear?" He won't change his forest bill that opens things up to industry, he will simply give it a name that will calm the good conservatives of his base who demand their government has a heart. He will call it the "Healthy Forests" bill. He will call his air quality rollback the "Clear Skies" act. Only one problem. Conservatives are not stupid - in fact, they are very vigilant in keeping an eye on their government, which they have a predisposition not to trust. And so, the conservatives are falling off in droves and droves, recognizing that President Bush is in no way a true conservative, in no way is he a compassionate paternalist like real conservatives are. They see this new breed of conservative as greedy, destructive wolves once again in conservative clothing.



George W Bush, leader of the Nuclear supersized western free world, now has a 29% overall job approval rating. Some people might consider this poor public image to be merely a 6th year slump. But I am among those who see's this slump as much more than that. Some of us believe that George W Bush was in fact a co-conspirator in the 9-11 attacks, and feel that a 29% backing in the polls is like cornering a very rabid and dangerous dog. They would say that the disapproval rating might entice him into trying yet again try to heroicly rise out of the ashes of a terrorist attack. If the conspiracy theorists are correct, and Neoconservatives are responsible for 9-11, than this administration will do whatever it takes to stay in office. For darkness despises the light, and sin clings to shadows. As long as this administration is under the disguise of doing "what is best for the nation" they will continue to attack in a stealthy and subtle manner. 9-11 launched these men into the power they now have. But now there is a threat of of Neocons losing that power, and it is well within reason that they would consider, plan and execute an event which will lead to the death of thousands more. Predicitons include a nuclear strike to be blamed on Iran. They will kill more of us, because they aren't really guarding us. They are as the false shepherds who did not enter the white house through the gate of the popular vote. They see us as something to be taken, used, disposed of. They do not care for the American people, and exposing them for the wolves they are might incite a confrontation, but much better a confrontation with a visible enemy than to be robbed raped and murdered by a professing friend. George Bush calling himself a "compassionate conservative" is a joke if it is taken lightly, or the most serious and telling in a long string of well documented lies.


January 22, 2006

Wolf at the door.


The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was to convince the world that he doesn't exist. The second greatest trick he pulled was to lure his enemies into doing his bidding while thinking that they were serving God. It's the classic bait and switch. The devil did it in Jerusalem, when he convinced the Jewish religious leaders into condemning their own messiah to death. He did it to the Catholic church, through bribery, envy and pride he transformed the church from it's roots of service, humility and love to something completely different; something fierce and sinister. But never before has the devil been as successful at this maneuver as he has been in the rise of the religious right.

I recently hit the road across the southeast, and couldn't help but notice as I drove how many Christian/patriotic bumper stickers there were in traffic, usually slapped on the backs of family-friendly gas guzzling SUVs. I saw Crosses infused with American flags, red white and blue backgrounds for various propaganda mantras like, "God bless America". I saw a Bush Fish, or two, or seven. There was even one car that had a Bush Cheney '04 sticker on one side, and a bright, red WWJD sticker on the other.

In case you were blessed by not being raised within the conservative church, WWJD was a massively successful christian gimick, first born on cheap overpriced bracelets, and marketed to the teenage sheep of the mid-nineties. It stood for the question, "What Would Jesus Do?". Of course, the religious right had no problem with holding up that light of scrutiny to the hell-bound liberal-run society of those days. Preachers from sea to shining sea relished in asking their congregation whether Bill Clinton's particular actions of the moment were what Jesus would do. Of course, the question was never asked when people might have answered, "yes"to it.

Yet interestingly enough, as soon as George W Bush entered office, that whole line of scrutiny was thrown out the window. It was the changing of the guard. Fox news turned from rabid watchdog to gushing lapdog overnight. And so did the church. Led like lambs to the slaughter, drawn to it by their prejudice, self-righteousness and presumption. American congregations were deceived into believing that their christian hope would come from this political system. They saw George W Bush as their ticket to righteous redemption. All the wickedness of America had to be dealt with, or so it was preached to them with ever-increasing intensity throughout the 90's by GOP representatives. Fear has been the determining factor in herding and manipulating this group of sheep into the voting booth. They have been led to graze not on the green pastures of the truth of Jesus Christ and his teachings, but on the crabgrass of hatred, greed, and selfishness. And they have learned how to quench their thirst with the blood of the innocent.

It does not take a saint to see that George W Bush is no real christian. Yet, ironically, a good portion of church-going Americans can't see beyond their hope in his honesty and sincerity. They want him to be one of them. Beginning in the presidential race of 2000 and continuing all throughout the aftermath of 9-11, George W Bush spoke boastfully about restoring decency, integrity, and godliness to America. He also spoke often of the inevitable triumph that the forces of good will have over the forces of evil. He has effectively turned American foreign policy into a dark, violent fairy tale. And it all started with Operation Infinite Justice.
His rhetoric has always been spiritually charged, and so that means he is either truly a man of God, or an outrageous liar. By the church's unquestioning endorsement of George W Bush, and out of their hope that he is who he claims to be, they have been led to believe a lie. The devil has diguised himself as an angel of light and completely manipulated the church, as Paul warned would happen, when he said that the antichrist would blind and deceive many..."if possible, even the very elect". Church-goers that I have spoken with about these matters have called me an alarmist, or conspiracy theorist. They seem to have this unwavering calm about them, despite the atrocities currently being done in the name of God. and they boast in their ignorace, calling it faith. They want to live their American lives to the fullness of it's comfortable splendor. They want to check out and just wait for the rapture, while the world outside burns alive (which in no way resembles a loving attitude to their neighbors)

Jesus spoke clearly about what was really going on in his day, and also in the days before his return. He plainly called Satan the "god of this world". And in the second of three temptations that Christ endured in the wilderness, it is shown that Satan himself has been given personal control over all the kingdoms of this world throughout history. We are warned time and time again to flee the devil, to flee worldliness. Paul said, "Do not conform to the patterns of this world, but be trasformed by the renewing of your minds." Note that we are to be transformed, not to transform. And yet the church is willing to throw all of it's faith on the back of a politician like Bush, who acts in the name of God. They have looked to this man for the transformation of our nation. They have hoped in this man to save them, when only Christ Jesus can. The disasterous, destructive nature of this so-called "born again" president's reign is overlooked and justified by them. All because he boastfully claims to be one of them, one of the sheep.

This decade so far has seen amazing destruction brought about by wars and weather. We are on the brink of collapse in many areas, and yet it seems that the face of this living nightmare is something most people refuse to recognize. Why? several reasons. Number one involves a veil of "strong delusion" spoken of in 2 Thesselonians 2:9-12, Number two involves the corporate media and other disinformation sources which demonstrate to, and reinforce in the masses a carefree attitude towards these troubling days. We don't know what to do. Experts and politicians are always telling us that they know what to do...and yet it always seems as if nothing good is ever done.

But for us to take personal responsibility and learn what to do would cost us the comfortable, carefree lives our masters are offering us in exchange for our souls. And rather than pay up front, most people will choose to take the easy way out. They will wait for someone else to take the lead and guide us all out of this social mess that we have made.

The simple truth is that most people would rather follow than lead...and the deeper truth is that many of those who are leading us now are promoting a very sinister agenda. It's our job as God's creation and American citizens to care about and to be aware of our surroundings. But the enemy of mankind has always wanted us to fall asleep on the job. Only in a society with ipods could we dance our way to Armageddon.

And Bush instigated our unrepentent, self-centered oblivion by calling upon our patriotic duty to go shopping in the aftermath of tragedy. It's a mob mentality, the rule of the majority; a buzzing frothing frenzy of mindless reinforcement... Civilized people are completely imprisoned without acknowledging it. Lies have become our bread and water. We are saturated with the lying wonder that is the status quo. So much so, that we have completely forgotten the solid, reinforcing nature of the truth. We lie to ourselves, as well as each other, and we lie to the one because we lie to the other. We reinforce each other's delusion by our respective paths of selfish oblivion. If no one said a thing we would never recognize the danger we are in.

I am very grateful that there are many other "freedom fighters" out there. Glad that I am but one of many who sees what's wrong in this. But considering the staggeringly centralized organization of the opposition, we need all the voices we can get right about now. Christ always seemed to say it best, and this is no exception to that rule, "The harvest is plentiful, but the laborers are few. Pray that God would send more laborers to tend the feild".


January 03, 2006

Peace on Earth & Good Will To All Men

Blogger's disclaimer:This is an incredible true story I stumbled across Christmas night on snopes.com
This is an article cut and pasted from another site Copyright be damned, I cut and pasted it in it's entirety because the implications of this story are too hard cutting to disregard.
In March of next year, a french film entitled Joyeux Noel will be released to the general public. I only hope it will reach American theaters. This true story is exactly the standard of human decency we need to remember in the barrage of "Support our troops" yellow ribbon bumper stickers. This is the Christian spirit that is the answer to the 700 club and their murderous prayer campaign "Operation Prayer Sheild"
The proof is in the Christmas pudding. A little bit late to be posting this now, I realise, but better late than never. As John Lennon said "All that we're saying, is give peace a chance!!"
Young Brother.




The Christmas Truce

You are standing up to your knees in the slime of a waterlogged trench. It is the evening of 24 December 1914 and you are on the dreaded Western Front.

Stooped over, you wade across to the firing step and take over the watch. Having exchanged pleasantries, your bleary-eyed and mud-spattered colleague shuffles off towards his dug out. Despite the horrors and the hardships, your morale is high and you believe that in the New Year the nation's army march towards a glorious victory.

But for now you stamp your feet in a vain attempt to keep warm. All is quiet when jovial voices call out from both friendly and enemy trenches. Then the men from both sides start singing carols and songs. Next come requests not to fire, and soon the unthinkable happens: you start to see the shadowy shapes of soldiers gathering together in no-man's land laughing, joking and sharing gifts.

Many have exchanged cigarettes, the lit ends of which burn brightly in the inky darkness. Plucking up your courage, you haul yourself up and out of the trench and walk towards the foe...

The meeting of enemies as friends in no-man's land was experienced by hundreds, if not thousands, of men on the Western Front during Christmas 1914. Today, 90 years after it occurred, the event is seen as a shining episode of sanity from among the bloody chapters of World War One – a spontaneous effort by the lower ranks to create a peace that could have blossomed were it not for the interference of generals and politicians.

The reality of the Christmas Truce, however, is a slightly less romantic and a more down to earth story. It was an organic affair that in some spots hardly registered a mention and in others left a profound impact upon those who took part.

Many accounts were rushed, confused or contradictory. Others, written long after the event, are weighed down by hindsight. These difficulties aside, the true story is still striking precisely because of its rag-tagged nature: it is more 'human' and therefore all the more potent.

Months beforehand, millions of servicemen, reservists and volunteers from all over the continent had rushed enthusiastically to the banners of war: the atmosphere was one of holiday rather than conflict.

But it was not long before the jovial façade was torn away. Armies equipped with repeating rifles, machine guns and a vast array of artillery tore chunks out of each other, and thousands upon thousands of men perished.


To protect against the threat of this vast firepower, the soldiers were ordered to dig in and prepare for next year's offensives, which most men believed would break the deadlock and deliver victory.

The early trenches were often hasty creations and poorly constructed; if the trench was badly sighted it could become a sniping hot spot. In bad weather (the winter of 1914 was a dire one) the positions could flood and fall in. The soldiers – unequipped to face the rigours of the cold and rain – found themselves wallowing in a freezing mire of mud and the decaying bodies of the fallen.

The man at the Front could not help but have a degree of sympathy for his opponents who were having just as miserable a time as they were.

Another factor that broke down the animosity between the opposing armies were the surroundings. In 1914 the men at the front could still see the vestiges of civilisation. Villages, although badly smashed up, were still standing. Fields, although pitted with shell-holes, had not been turned into muddy lunarscapes.

Thus the other world – the civilian world – and the social mores and manners that went with it was still present at the front. Also lacking was the pain, misery and hatred that years of bloody war build up. Then there was the desire, on all sides, to see the enemy up close – was he really as bad as the politicians, papers and priests were saying?



It was a combination of these factors, and many more minor ones, that made the Christmas Truce of 1914 possible.

On the eve of the Truce, the British Army (still a relatively small presence on the Western Front) was manning a stretch of the line running south from the infamous Ypres salient for 27 miles to the La Bassee Canal.

Along the front the enemy was sometimes no more than 70, 50 or even 30 yards away. Both Tommy and Fritz could quite easily hurl greetings and insults to one another, and, importantly, come to tacit agreements not to fire. Incidents of temporary truces and outright fraternisation were more common at this stage in the war than many people today realise – even units that had just taken part in a series of futile and costly assaults, were still willing to talk and come to arrangements with their opponents.

As Christmas approached the festive mood and the desire for a lull in the fighting increased as parcels packed with goodies from home started to arrive. On top of this came gifts care of the state. Tommy received plum puddings and 'Princess Mary boxes'; a metal case engraved with an outline of George V's daughter and filled with chocolates and butterscotch, cigarettes and tobacco, a picture card of Princess Mary and a facsimile of George V's greeting to the troops. 'May God protect you and bring you safe home,' it said.

Not to be outdone, Fritz received a present from the Kaiser, the Kaiserliche, a large meerschaum pipe for the troops and a box of cigars for NCOs and officers. Towns, villages and cities, and numerous support associations on both sides also flooded the front with gifts of food, warm clothes and letters of thanks.

The Belgians and French also received goods, although not in such an organised fashion as the British or Germans. For these nations the Christmas of 1914 was tinged with sadness – their countries were occupied. It is no wonder that the Truce, although it sprung up in some spots on French and Belgian lines, never really caught hold as it did in the British sector.

With their morale boosted by messages of thanks and their bellies fuller than normal, and with still so much Christmas booty to hand, the season of goodwill entered the trenches. A British Daily Telegraph correspondent wrote that on one part of the line the Germans had managed to slip a chocolate cake into British trenches.
Even more amazingly, it was accompanied with a message asking for a ceasefire later that evening so they could celebrate the festive season and their Captain's birthday. They proposed a concert at 7.30pm when candles, the British were told, would be placed on the parapets of their trenches.

The British accepted the invitation and offered some tobacco as a return present. That evening, at the stated time, German heads suddenly popped up and started to sing. Each number ended with a round of applause from both sides.

The Germans then asked the British to join in. At this point, one very mean-spirited Tommy shouted: 'We'd rather die than sing German.' To which a German joked aloud: 'It would kill us if you did'.


December 24 was a good day weather-wise: the rain had given way to clear skies.

On many stretches of the Front the crack of rifles and the dull thud of shells ploughing into the ground continued, but at a far lighter level than normal. In other sectors there was an unnerving silence that was broken by the singing and shouting drifting over, in the main, from the German trenches.

Along many parts of the line the Truce was spurred on with the arrival in the German trenches of miniature Christmas trees – Tannenbaum. The sight these small pines, decorated with candles and strung along the German parapets, captured the Tommies' imagination, as well as the men of the Indian corps who were reminded of the sacred Hindu festival of light.

British soldiers bringing in Christmas holly It was the perfect excuse for the opponents to start shouting to one another, to start singing and, in some areas, to pluck up the courage to meet one another in no-man's land.

By now, the British high command – comfortably 'entrenched' in a luxurious châteaux 27 miles behind the front – was beginning to hear of the fraternisation.



Stern orders were issued by the commander of the BEF, Sir John French against such behaviour. Other 'brass-hats' (as the Tommies nick-named their high-ranking officers and generals), also made grave pronouncements on the dangers and consequences of parleying with the Germans.

However, there were many high-ranking officers who took a surprisingly relaxed view of the situation. If anything, they believed it would at least offer their men an opportunity to strengthen their trenches. This mixed stance meant that very few officers and men involved in the Christmas Truce were disciplined.

Interestingly, the German High Command's ambivalent attitude towards the Truce mirrored that of the British.



Christmas day began quietly but once the sun was up the fraternisation began. Again songs were sung and rations thrown to one another. It was not long before troops and officers started to take matters into their own hands and ventured forth. No-man's land became something of a playground.

Men exchanged gifts and buttons. In one or two places soldiers who had been barbers in civilian times gave free haircuts. One German, a juggler and a showman, gave an impromptu, and given the circumstances, somewhat surreal performance of his routine in the centre of no-man's land.

Two Territorials of London Rifle Brigade with Saxon troops of the 104th and 106th Regiments in No Man's Land near Ploegsteert Wood during the unofficial Christmas TruceCaptain Sir Edward Hulse of the Scots Guards, in his famous account, remembered the approach of four unarmed Germans at 08.30. He went out to meet them with one of his ensigns. 'Their spokesmen,' Hulse wrote, 'started off by saying that he thought it only right to come over and wish us a happy Christmas, and trusted us implicitly to keep the truce. He came from Suffolk where he had left his best girl and a 3 ½ h.p. motor-bike!'

Having raced off to file a report at headquarters, Hulse returned at 10.00 to find crowds of British soldiers and Germans out together chatting and larking about in no-man's land, in direct contradiction to his orders.

Not that Hulse seemed to care about the fraternisation in itself – the need to be seen to follow orders was his concern. Thus he sought out a German officer and arranged for both sides to return to their lines.




While this was going on he still managed to keep his ears and eyes open to the fantastic events that were unfolding.

'Scots and Huns were fraternizing in the most genuine possible manner. Every sort of souvenir was exchanged addresses given and received, photos of families shown, etc. One of our fellows offered a German a cigarette; the German said, "Virginian?" Our fellow said, "Aye, straight-cut", the German said "No thanks, I only smoke Turkish!"... It gave us all a good laugh.'

Hulse's account was in part a letter to his mother, who in turn sent it on to the newspapers for publication, as was the custom at the time. Tragically, Hulse was killed in March 1915.

On many parts of the line the Christmas Day truce was initiated through sadder means. Both sides saw the lull as a chance to get into no-man's land and seek out the bodies of their compatriots and give them a decent burial. Once this was done the opponents would inevitably begin talking to one another.

The 6th Gordon Highlanders, for example, organised a burial truce with the enemy. After the gruesome task of laying friends and comrades to rest was complete, the fraternisation began.

With the Truce in full swing up and down the line there were a number of recorded games of soccer, although these were really just 'kick-abouts' rather than a structured match.

On January 1, 1915, the London Times published a letter from a major in the Medical Corps reporting that in his sector the British played a game against the Germans opposite and were beaten 3-2.

Kurt Zehmisch of the 134th Saxons recorded in his diary: 'The English brought a soccer ball from the trenches, and pretty soon a lively game ensued. How marvellously wonderful, yet how strange it was. The English officers felt the same way about it. Thus Christmas, the celebration of Love, managed to bring mortal enemies together as friends for a time.'

The Truce lasted all day; in places it ended that night, but on other sections of the line it held over Boxing Day and in some areas, a few days more. In fact, there parts on the front where the absence of aggressive behaviour was conspicuous well into 1915.

Captain J C Dunn, the Medical Officer in the Royal Welch Fusiliers, whose unit had fraternised and received two barrels of beer from the Saxon troops opposite, recorded how hostilities re-started on his section of the front.

Dunn wrote: 'At 8.30 I fired three shots in the air and put up a flag with "Merry Christmas" on it, and I climbed on the parapet. He [the Germans] put up a sheet with "Thank you" on it, and the German Captain appeared on the parapet. We both bowed and saluted and got down into our respective trenches, and he fired two shots in the air, and the War was on again.'



The war was indeed on again, for the Truce had no hope of being maintained. Despite being wildly reported in Britain and to a lesser extent in Germany, the troops and the populations of both countries were still keen to prosecute the conflict.

Today, pragmatists read the Truce as nothing more than a 'blip' – a temporary lull induced by the season of goodwill, but willingly exploited by both sides to better their defences and eye out one another's positions. Romantics assert that the Truce was an effort by normal men to bring about an end to the slaughter.

In the public's mind the facts have become irrevocably mythologized, and perhaps this is the most important legacy of the Christmas Truce today. In our age of uncertainty, it comforting to believe, regardless of the real reasoning and motives, that soldiers and officers told to hate, loathe and kill, could still lower their guns and extend the hand of goodwill, peace, love and Christmas cheer.